Research on health informatics at Kaiser Permanente Washington focuses on developing and using health information technology (IT) to transform health care delivery. By testing new paradigms of care that provide more opportunities to engage patients, this research is supplying valuable evidence that is helping shape federal policy and guiding innovative redesign of health care.
“We’re working to understand how to make health IT practical so patients and care teams find it useful and engaging,” explained Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (KPWHRI) Senior Investigator James Ralston, MD, MPH. “We want to find ways to use information technologies to support patients and providers together, both inside and outside the office.”
Integral to this support is designing technologies that are user-friendly and meet the needs of both patients and providers. By applying human-centered methods that focus on needs, use, and usability, KPWHRI researchers inform the design of health IT with direct participation from users.
Groundbreaking methodological work by KPWHRI health informatics researchers includes developing natural language processing (NLP) to analyze text such as notes and written reports in electronic health records (EHRs). Assistant Investigator David Carrell, PhD, leads in the area of using NLP and machine learning to identify patient phenotypes, or specific health characteristics such as possible heart disease, risk of opioid overdose, or suggestion of colon cancer. This information can assist researchers in studying how genetics and other factors influence disease.
Other examples of KPWHRI health informatics research include projects using EHRs and secure electronic communications such as:
Examples of KPWHRI research in mobile health (mHealth) and user-centered design include:
“Our studies on using health IT to improve care are showing that we can achieve better outcomes when we shift care from the doctor’s office to where people live: in their homes—and online,” said Senior Investigator Beverly B. Green, MD, MPH.
Weiner BJ, Mettert KD, Dorsey CN, Nolen EA, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Lewis CC. Measuring readiness for implementation: a systematic review of measures’ psychometric and pragmatic properties. Implement Res Pract. August 26, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489520933896. PubMed
Shortreed SM, Simon GE Using predictive analytics to improve pragmatic trial design 2020 Aug;17(4):394-401. doi: 10.1177/1740774520910367. Epub 2020-03-10. PubMed
Shortreed SM, Moodie EEM Automated analyses: Because we can, does it mean we should? 2020 Aug;35(3):499-502. doi: 10.1214/20-sts773. Epub 2020-09-11. PubMed
Utzschneider KM, Johnson TN, Breymeyer KL, Bettcher L, Raftery D, Newton KM, Neuhouser ML Small changes in glucose variability induced by low and high glycemic index diets are not associated with changes in ß-cell function in adults with pre-diabetes 2020 Aug;34(8):107586. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107586. Epub 2020-04-18. PubMed
Carrell DS, Malin BA, Cronkite DJ, Aberdeen JS, Clark C, Li MR, Bastakoty D, Nyemba S, Hirschman L Resilience of clinical text de-identified with "hiding in plain sight" to hostile reidentification attacks by human readers 2020 Jul;27(9):1374-1382. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa095. PubMed
Claire Allen, MPHManager, Collaborative Science |
Katharine A. Bradley, MD, MPHSenior Investigator |
Yates Coley, PhDAssociate Biostatistics Investigator |
Beverly B. Green, MD, MPHSenior Investigator |
Annie Hoopes, MD, MPHAssistant Investigator |
Paula Lozano, MD, MPHSenior Investigator; Director, ACT Center |
James D. Ralston, MD, MPHSenior Investigator |
Brian D. Williamson, PhDAssociate Biostatistics Investigator |